Cases 91 - 100 of 572
Lane d/b/a Caged Potential v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2012cv04219
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Y. Lane d/b/a Caged Potential
Defendant:
George A. Lombardi , Dave Dormire and Mariann B. Atwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Cutts v. Dave Dormire
as 12-2819
Petitioner - Appellant:
Rodney E. Cutts
Respondent - Appellee:
Dave Dormire
Joseph Murchison v. John Rogers, et al
as 12-2745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Murchison
Defendant:
John Rogers, Terrena Ballinger and Greg Hadley
Defendant - Appellee:
Warden Michael Bowersox, George Lombardi and Superintendent Dave Dormire
Walsh v. Dormire et al
as 2:2012cv04206
Plaintiff:
Mark Terrell Walsh
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Reed, Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darren Lee v. Jeremiah Nixon, et al
as 12-2621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darren Lee
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, George Lombardi, Gale E. Bailey and others
Sitton v. Correctional Medical Services (CMS) et al
as 2:2012cv04191
Plaintiff:
Danny C Sitton
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services (CMS), Erin Escamilla, John A. Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roland Tyler v. Dave Dormire
as 12-2571
Petitioner - Appellant:
Roland T. Tyler
Respondent - Appellee:
Dave Dormire
Murlin Phillips v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 12-2148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Murlin R. Phillips
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Dave Dormire, Jerry B. Lange and others
Eugene Jones-El v. David Webster, et al
as 12-2159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eugene Kenneth Jones-El
Defendant - Appellee:
David Webster, Dave Courm, Edward L. Ruppel and others
George Aldridge, Jr. v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 12-2066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
George Franklin Aldridge, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, C.O.1 Falter, Paul Gore and others
Defendant:
Officer N. Rollins
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
