Cases 91 - 100 of 167
Deatherage v. Spears et al
as 3:2016cv05114
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Don Deatherage
Defendant:
John Spears, Jim Arnott, Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clary et al v. Woodfin Suites et al
as 5:2016cv06131
Plaintiff:
Brenda L Clary, Derek L Ivy, DLI and others
Defendant:
Woodfin Suites, Hartage Hospitality, Chris Scrivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Schmidt v. Willoughby et al
as 1:2016cv00160
Plaintiff:
Justin L. Schmidt
Defendant:
Robert Willoughby , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe v. Avid Life Media, Inc., et al
as 4:2015cv01878
Defendant:
Avid Life Media, Inc. and Avid Dating Life, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 , John Doe #2 , John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Cassady et al
as 2:2015cv04199
Plaintiff:
Vincent X Lee
Defendant:
Jay Cassady, Bill Armontrout, Donald Wyrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Downard v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
as 4:2015cv01365
Plaintiff:
Jamie Downard
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. , John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tatum v. Owens et al
as 2:2015cv04183
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tatum
Defendant:
Randall Owens, Gregory Smith, David Rothenay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oblinger v. Sigman et al
as 6:2015cv03260
Plaintiff:
David Elmer Oblinger
Defendant:
James Sigman, Glenda Campbell, Tom Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Federal Insurance Company v. SKMDV Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00647
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
SKMDV Holdings, Inc. , Courtroom Technology Consultants, Inc. , Michael Gross Law Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Esposito v. Nixon et al
as 2:2015cv04073
Plaintiff:
Vincent J Esposito
Defendant:
Jay Nixon, George Lombardi, Jason Kander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
