Cases 111 - 120 of 175
United States of America v. Alvarez
as 6:2013cv03489
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Victor Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245
Alvarez-Santos v. United States of America
as 5:2013cv04051
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Alvarez-Santos
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
De Alvarez v. United States of America
as 5:2013cv04026
Petitioner:
Sandra Garcia De Alvarez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Felix Alvarez v. United State
as 13-1093
Petitioner:
Felix Alvarez
Respondent:
United States of America
John Cottrell, et al v. Michael Duke, et al
as 12-3871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Cottrell, Derivatively and on behalf of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, Added from Member Case 12-4045, Elizabeth Tuberville, Added from Member Case 12-4046 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael T. Duke, Aida M. Alvarez, James W. Breyer and others
Alvarez v. USA
as 4:2012cv00614
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marco Antonio Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States v. Sandra De Alvarez
as 12-2858
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Sandra Garcia De Alvarez
Emory v. Duke et al
as 5:2012cv05171
Plaintiff:
Larry Emory
Defendant:
Michael T Duke , Aida M Alvarez , James W Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Felipe Alvarez-Quiroz v. United State
as 12-2655
Petitioner:
Felipe Eduardo Alvarez-Quiroz
Respondent:
United States of America
Emory v. Duke et al
as 4:2012cv00404
Plaintiff:
Larry Emory
Defendant:
Michael T Duke , Aida M Alvarez , James W Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
