Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Cornell v. Bennett
as 4:2021cv04056
Petitioner:
David Allen Cornell
Respondent:
K. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stoops v. Bennett
as 4:2021cv04050
Plaintiff:
Jason Stoops
Respondent:
Kimberly Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Long v. Orrock et al
as 5:2018cv05049
Defendant:
Jason Fanning, Jeff Slattery, City of Martin, South Dakota and others
Plaintiff:
Britt T. Long
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
County of Bennett, South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv05077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12201
Poor Bear et al v. The County of Jackson et al
as 5:2014cv05059
Plaintiff:
Thomas Poor Bear , Don Doyle , Cheryl D. Bettelyoun and others
Defendant:
The County of Jackson , The Board of Commissioners for the County of Jackson , Vicki Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Miller
as 1:2013cv01016
Plaintiff:
Tamra Bennett
Defendant:
Ann Marie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett v. Miller
as 1:2013cv01005
Plaintiff:
Tamra Bennett
Defendant:
Ann Marie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Bennett County Hospital & Nursing Home v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2012cv03028
Plaintiff:
Bennett County Hospital & Nursing Home
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, Indian Health Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gibbons et al v. Pilcher et al
as 5:2012cv05035
Plaintiff:
Ivan Gibbons, Sr. and Ivan Gibbons, Jr.
Defendant:
Vincent Pilcher, Nate Eisenmenger, Chief Medeiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbons et al v. Pilcher et al
as 5:2012mc05035
Plaintiff:
Ivan Gibbons, Sr. and Ivan Gibbons, Jr.
Defendant:
Vincent Pilcher, Nate Eisenmenger, Chief Medeiros and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
