Cases 11 - 20 of 529
Lucas v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02736
Defendant:
Arizant Healthcare, Inc. and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Lucas v. Dadson Manufacturing Corp et al
as 4:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
James R Lucas
Defendant:
Thomas H Reppell, Dadson Manufacturing Corp and Peter B Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Munoz v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Lucas Munoz
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mack v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01013
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Lucas Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Doward v. City of Kettle River et al
as 0:2024cv02240
Defendant:
David C. Lucas, City of Kettle River, Advanced Utility Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Monique Annette Doward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Daniel Binion
as 24-2146
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Binion, also known as Daniel Lucas, also known as Donald Lucas, also known as Donald Jackson, also known as Daniel J. Lucas, also known as Kenneth Jackson, also known as Terrell Lucas, also known as Frank
Johnson v. Jackson County et al
as 4:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
TeLissah R Johnson
Defendant:
MO Jackson County, Eric Lyles, Joseph Turley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 2:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Angela Carson
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Lucas Anderson, Joshua Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
