Cases 11 - 20 of 6,567
Darrell Smith v. B. Eischen
as 24-2148
Petitioner:
Darrell Smith
Respondent:
Warden B. Eischen, FPC Duluth
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dietz v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00780
Petitioner:
Larry B. Dietz
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welch v. Deaver et al
as 4:2024cv03101
Plaintiff:
Brendan Welch
Defendant:
Paul Deaver, Cindy Bassett and Kale B. Burdick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Yocksan Herrera-Davila v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-2107
Petitioner:
Yocksan Rolando Herrera-Davila
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Alexander et al
as 4:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Ryan W. Alexander, Estate of Ashton C. Schouten, Br. A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Deardorff v. Bruce et al
as 4:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Arleyse B Deardorff
Defendant:
Unshanas D Bruce and SA&H Western Holdings, LLC d/b/a Mission Plumbing Heating and Cooling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Maud Borup, Inc. v. Chocolate StoryBook Too, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01959
Plaintiff:
Maud Borup, Inc.
Defendant:
Chocolate StoryBook Too, Inc. and Fairy tale Cotton Candy, Inc. d/b/a Chocolate Story Book
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
T.B.K., Inc. v. Illinois Casualty Company
as 0:2024cv01954
Plaintiff:
T.B.K., Inc. d/b/a Sidewinders
Defendant:
Illinois Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
