Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Hudson v. Walmart et al
as 8:2015cv00221
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Hudson
Defendant:
Walmart and Walmart Supercenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hudson v. Tri-Con Industry et al
as 4:2015cv03034
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Hudson
Defendant:
Lincoln Police Dept., Tri-Con Industry and U-Stop Convenient Store
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Schuster et al
as 4:2014cv03093
Defendant:
City of Beatrice, Dennis M. Schuster and Tobias Tempelmeyer
Plaintiff:
Ray Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hasley v Schuster, et al.
as 4:2013cv03221
Defendant:
City of Beatrice, Nebraska and Dennis M. Schuster
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hudson v. American National Bank
as 8:2013cv00357
Defendant:
American National Bank
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hudson v. Metropolition Community College
as 8:2012cv00259
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Hudson
Defendant:
Metropolition Community College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Madison v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Lita Madison
Traci Postmaster:
US Post Office-Beatrice
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Madison v. US Post Office-Beatrice
as 8:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Lita Madison
Defendant:
US Post Office-Beatrice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Smith et al v. Beatrice Baking Company (DO NOT FILE DOCUMENTS IN CASE PER FILING #7).
as 8:2011cv00206
Defendant:
Beatrice Baking Company
Plaintiff:
H. John Smith Trust, Evelyn F Smith and H. John Smith
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Hudson v. City of Omaha
as 8:2010cv00451
Defendant:
City of Omaha
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
