Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Deaton v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 2:2012cv00186
Plaintiff:
Christopher Deaton
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Ray Hobbs, Larry Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McEwing v. Shores et al
as 5:2012cv00298
Plaintiff:
Andre D McEwing
Defendant:
Shores, Hucherson, Cockrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. East Arkansas Regional Unit et al
as 2:2012cv00153
Plaintiff:
Carletus Adams
Defendant:
East Arkansas Regional Unit, Danny Burl, Millie L Drayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
DeQuan Thomas
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, James Banks, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benjamin v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2012cv00237
Plaintiff:
Michael Benjamin
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, William Straughn, Maurice Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Hill et al
as 1:2012cv00032
Plaintiff:
James Edward Williams
Defendant:
James A Hill, Christopher T Budnik, Minnie L Drayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Pevey et al
as 5:2012cv00096
Plaintiff:
Every Donelle Richardson
Defendant:
Amanda Pevey, Raymond Naylor and Minnie L Drayer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briley v. Drayer et al
as 5:2011cv00274
Plaintiff:
Eddie Briley, Jr
Defendant:
Mannie L Drayer, Chad Davis, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chestang v. Varner Super Max et al
as 5:2011cv00225
Plaintiff:
KeOndra M Chestang
Defendant:
Varner Super Max, Tucker Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, Roy Agee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
