Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Griffith v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00009
Petitioner:
Andre Tyrone Griffith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Griffith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
Brenna L Griffith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Cooper et al v. Vilsack et al
as 1:2011cv00141
Plaintiff:
Dorray Darnell Cooper , John L Hrbek and Joel P McKeag
Defendant:
Thomas J Vilsack, Chester J Culver, Terry E Branstad and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Steven Rowley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cains v. Griffith et al
as 6:2011cv02051
Plaintiff:
Ricky Cains
Defendant:
Kim Griffith and Any and All Unnamed Persons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Key
as 4:2011cv00262
Plaintiff:
Mark Douglas Morgan
Defendant:
Clarence Key, Jr., Elizabeth Robinson, Karen Kaplan Muelhaupt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper et al v. Vilsack et al
as 4:2011cv00208
Plaintiff:
Dorray Darnell Cooper, John L Hrbek and Joel P McKeag
Defendant:
Thomas J Vilsack, Chester J Culver, Terry E Branstad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Johnson v. Staudt et al
as 6:2009cv02037
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Johnson
Defendant:
Dave Staudt, Black Hawk County Public Defenders Office, Sue Swan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00254
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Conner v. Hickey et al
as 4:2007cv00202
Plaintiff:
Patrick Conner
Defendant:
Patrick Hickey, Thomas E Griffith and C Zubrod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
