Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Leslie v. US. Department of the Interior
as 4:2014cv00845
Plaintiff:
John Daniel Leslie
Defendant:
US. Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Hawkins v. Prudden
as 4:2013cv02506
Petitioner:
John Daniel Hawkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Douglas J. Prudden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. Prudden
as 4:2013cv02325
Petitioner:
John Daniel Hawkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Douglas J. Prudden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glickert et al v. The Loop Trolley Transportation Development District, et al.
as 4:2013cv02170
Plaintiff:
Elsie Beck Glickert , Jen Rivenes Jensen , Irene Franklin and others
Defendant:
The Loop Trolley Transportation Development District , The Loop Trolley Company, Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Leslie v. Maida Engineering, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00614
Plaintiff:
John Daniel Leslie
Defendant:
Maida Engineering, Inc. and Guarantee Electrical Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Hawkins v. Prudden
as 4:2013cv00313
Petitioner:
John Daniel Hawkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Douglas Prudden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. TeBrake
as 0:2011cv00333
Plaintiff:
Kenneth John Daniels
Defendant:
Larry TeBrake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lazaro D. Borrero v. City of St. Paul, et al
as 09-1529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lazaro Despaigne Borrero
Defendant - Appellee:
City of St. Paul, Police Department, Heather Gustafson and others
McAndrew v. McQuerry et al
as 4:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
Stephen McAndrew
Defendant:
John Daniel McQuerry, Aaron C. Petty, Abram T Butler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
