Cases 11 - 20 of 1,951
Lewis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01937
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Lewis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Lewis v. USA
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Corey C. Lewis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lewis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01891
Plaintiff:
Pamela Lewis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Criner v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Phillip Criner
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Samuel Snyder and CO I John Doe Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monderen v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
William Stange, Latonia Young-Griffin, Timothy Seabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. WestRock Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Felton Lewis and Felton J. Lewis
Defendant:
WestRock Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fredrick Hines v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1970
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Lewis v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.
as 4:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lewis
Defendant:
American Family Insurance Company and American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Shattuck-Knaebel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00454
Defendant:
Unknown Nichols, Missouri Department of Corrections, Bed Broker at Fulton Reception Diagnostic Center (2015) and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Shattuck-Knaebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
