Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Gibson v. Missouri, State of et al
as 1:2016cv00261
Plaintiff:
Travis W. Gibson
Defendant:
Missouri, State of , Missouri Department of Corrections , Rick Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis et al v. United States Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service et al
as 6:2016cv03251
Plaintiff:
Bobby L Willis , Carrie S Willis and James and Norma Willis Trust
Defendant:
United States Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Stephen Boyd, Jason Brushwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Belfield v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2015cv01153
Plaintiff:
Michael Gene Belfield
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Franklin County, Washington County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swiish, LLC. et al v. Nixon et al
as 4:2014cv02089
Plaintiff:
Swiish, LLC. , Corey Nickson-Clark and Chantelle Nickson-Clark
Defendant:
Jay Nixon , Ronald K. Replogle , Missouri Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Survivors Network, et al v. Jennifer Joyce, et al
as 13-3036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests, Inc., David Biersmith, Holly Hesemann and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Jennifer M. Joyce, solely in her official capacity as the Circuit Attorney for the City of St. Louis, Missouri, Chris Koster, solely in his official capacity as the Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Ronald K. Replogle, solely in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Missouri Highway Patrol and others
Hampton v. Missouri Highway Patrol et al
as 4:2012cv02161
Plaintiff:
Ricky Hampton
Defendant:
Missouri Highway Patrol and James Keathley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby McDonald, et al v. Laurent Javois, et al
as 12-2015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bobby McDonald and Yvonne Langston-McDonald
Defendant - Appellee:
Laurent D. Javois, Chief Exective Officer, Missouri Department of Mental Health, Individually and Officially, Donna Crowther, Caseworker/Cas Manager, St. Louis Area Mental Health Institution, Individually and Officially, Keith Schafer, Director, Missouri Department of Mental Health, Individually and Officially and others
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah Nixon, et al
as 11-3213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department and others
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah J. Nixon, et al
as 11-3114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri and Tim Fitch, in his official capacity as Chief of the St. Louis County, Missouri, Police Department
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah J. Nixon, et al
as 11-3112
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, James Corwin, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Kansas City, Missouri, Police Department and others
Defendant:
Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department, Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri, Steven Kruse, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Bowling Green, Missouri, Police Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
