Cases 11 - 20 of 1,293
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2406
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cardell Hunes
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Larry Norris)
United States v. Norris Hughes, Jr.
as 23-1623
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Norris O'Dell Hughes, Jr.
Fredrick Norris v. Charles Freyder, et al
as 23-1554
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fredrick Allen Norris
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles Freyder, Chaplain, Randall L. Williams, ADC, Owney, Lt. Randall L. Williams & Ester Units, ADC, Lee, Major- Building Security, Randall L. Williams, ADC and others
Andrews v. USA
as 0:2023cv00535
Petitioner:
Norris Deshon Andrews
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Norris et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Norris, John Rumple, Quashawn Cypress and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Norris v. Forrest City Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jaqwan Norris
Defendant:
Forrest City Police Department and Carl Cannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Freyder et al
as 4:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Fredrick A Norris
Defendant:
Charles Freyder, Owney, Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredrick Norris v. Culelager, et al
as 22-3391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fredrick Allen Norris
Defendant / Appellee:
Culelager, Disciplinary Notification Officer, Pine Bluff Unit, Paige, Head Warden Pine Bluff Unit, Ester Unit, Randall L. Williams Unit, Naylor, Disciplinary Hearing Administrator Central Office and others
United States v. Lamont Norris
as 22-3376
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Lamont Ladarryl Norris
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 22-3265
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Larry Norris)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
