Cases 11 - 20 of 45
State of Minnesota v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 0:2021mc00081
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Novo Nordisk, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Co.
Petitioner:
Minnesota Department of Human Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Westerfield et al v. Wyeth et al
as 4:2010cv02081
Defendant:
Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc, Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Arlene Westerfield and Harlin Westerfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Westerfield et al v. Wyeth et al
as 4:2010cv02242
Plaintiff:
Arlene Westerfield and Harlin Westerfield
Defendant:
Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv04656
Plaintiff:
Roseanna Lee
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, LLC, Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Novo Nordisk Inc. et al v. Paddock Laboratories, Inc.
as 0:2010cv02199
Plaintiff:
Novo Nordisk Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S
Defendant:
Paddock Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chiles v. Wyeth, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00344
Defendant:
Wyeth Inc, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc, ESI Lederle and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon S Chiles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
