Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Berry v. Carpenter et al
as 4:2016cv00268
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Berry
Defendant:
Abraham Carpenter, James Wallace, John Belken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doering v. Felts, et al
as 6:2016cv06019
Plaintiff:
Alan Doering
Defendant:
John Felts, Richard Brown, Jr., Dawne B. Vandiver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doering v. Felts, et al
as 4:2016cv00104
Defendant:
John Felts, Andy Shock, Richard Brown, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Doering
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Felt et al
as 4:2015cv00302
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Jackson
Defendant:
John Felt, Richard Brown, Dawne B Vandive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Felts et al
as 4:2015cv00258
Plaintiff:
Courtney Smith
Defendant:
John Felts, Richard Brown, Jr, Dennis Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02119
Plaintiff:
Richard Brown , Bradley D. Knadler , B&K Kagay Farms, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. Felts et al
as 5:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Rantrez Robinson
Defendant:
Thon Felts, Richard Brown, James Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Norris Williams v. Kim Lloyd, et al
as 14-3485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Norris Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
Kim Lloyd, Parole Officer, Lonoke County, John Felts, Chairman, Post-Prison Transfer Board of Arkansas, Jimmy Wallace, Vice Chairman, Post-Prison Transfer Board of Arkansas and others
Robinson v. Beebe et al
as 4:2014cv00600
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Rantrez Robinson
Defendant:
Mike Beebe, John Felts, Shelia Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Lloyd et al
as 4:2014cv00514
Plaintiff:
Norris Williams
Defendant:
Kim Lloyd, John Felts, Jimmy Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
