Cases 11 - 20 of 192
Winston Brakeall v. Leidholt, et al
as 19-3566
Defendant / Appellee:
South Dakota Parole Division, Phil Toft, Lt. Chad Rotert, SD DOC employee employed at SDSP, JPA, and/or Unit C in Sioux Falls, South Dakota; in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Winston Grey Brakeall
Donald East v. Minnehaha County, et al
as 19-2621
Defendant / Appellee:
Linda Osborne, Jean Heisler, MD, Brian Foley and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald East
East v. Dooley et al
as 4:2019cv04126
Defendant:
LPN Brittany Huber, CO Mastalir, Warden Robert Dooley and others
Plaintiff:
Donald East
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv04101
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thompson v. Young et al
as 4:2019cv04003
Defendant:
Jenife Dricki, Troy Ponte, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landman v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2018cv04175
Defendant:
Brent Fluke, Karissa Livingston, Jane/John Doe staff working in MDSP mailroom on/after and others
Plaintiff:
Burton Kenneth Landman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White Calf v. Dooley et al
as 5:2018cv05023
Petitioner:
Shaun A. White Calf
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Seventh Judicial Circuit Court and S.D. Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kling v. Louie et al
as 4:2018cv04027
Plaintiff:
Kary Gene Kling
Defendant:
Ed Louie, Robert Dooley, Jeremy Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Litschewski v. Kaemingk et al
as 1:2017cv01023
Plaintiff:
Richard Litschewski
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk and Robert Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2017cv04116
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Shaw
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
