Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Sailors v. US Marshals Service Dept. et al
as 8:2018cv00189
Defendant:
Maxwell Hubka, Cole Jennings, Paul Keyes and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Sailors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. US Marshals Service
as 4:2017cv00935
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Robinson
Respondent:
US Marshals Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 4:2017cv00418
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, US Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. US Marshals Service
as 4:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
Maurice A Johnson
Defendant:
US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Waltermeyer v. Pottawattamie County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Broc Todd Waltermeyer
Defendant:
Pottawattamie County Sheriff's Department, Aramark Food Services and US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyons v. Sanders et al
as 6:2016cv03074
Plaintiff:
Deon Lorenzo Lyons
Defendant:
Linda Sanders, J Grondolsky, FMC Devens Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hunter v. Herrington et al
as 6:2014cv03366
Petitioner:
Michael Hunter
Respondent:
Ron Herrington, US Marshals Service and Linda Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Trevino v. Woodberry County Jail et al
as 5:2014cv04051
Plaintiff:
Richard Trevino
Defendant:
Woodberry County Jail, Lieutenant Phillips, Carlos Lnu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woolridge v. US Marshals Service et al
as 4:2014cv00243
Plaintiff:
Joshua Todd Woolridge
Defendant:
US Marshals Service and Bryan H. Cutter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilmore v. Keeler et al
as 4:2013cv01148
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Gilmore
Defendant:
Scott Keeler, Sammy Bowden and US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
