Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Davis et al
as 4:2016mc00014
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Richard W Davis, Jr, DCG Real Assets LLC, DCG Commercial Fund I LLC and others
Receiver:
A Cotten Wright
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Davis et al
as 1:2016mc00011
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Richard W. Davis, Jr. , DCG Real Assets, LLC , DCG Commercial Fund I, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Evenson v. Davis et al
as 5:2015cv05061
Plaintiff:
Dennis J. Evenson
Defendant:
Jeff W. Davis, Craig Pfeifle, Rapid City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Van Trump et al
as 5:2015cv06104
Plaintiff:
Neil W. Davis and Teresa T. Davis
Defendant:
Ray J. Van Trump and Atlas Roofing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Blue Bird v. Leningren et al
as 5:2015cv05022
Plaintiff:
Charles Blue Bird
Defendant:
Hiedi Leningren, Thomas Trimible, Robert A. Mandel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davies v. Minor
as 5:2014cv06117
Petitioner:
Jeffrey W Davies
Respondent:
Dean Minor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Colvin
as 6:2014cv03150
Plaintiff:
Larry W Davis
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Evenson v. Davis
as 5:2014cv05018
Petitioner:
Dennis Evenson
Respondent:
Jeff W. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowty v. 6th - 7th Circuit Court et al
as 5:2012cv05039
Plaintiff:
Earl David Dowty
Defendant:
6th - 7th Circuit Court, City of Hot Springs, County of Fall River and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ralph Buchhold v. Douglas Weber, et al
as 11-3749
Petitioner - Appellant:
Ralph Buchhold
Respondent - Appellee:
Douglas Weber, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, Marty J. Jackley, Attorney General of the State of South Dakota, Glenn A. Brenner, Pennington County State's Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
