Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Harnden v. Cass County, Missouri et al
as 4:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
Allison Harnden
Defendant:
Cass County, Missouri, Dwight Diehl, Lawrence Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Diehl et al
as 4:2009cv00360
Plaintiff:
Mark Lyle Clark
Defendant:
Dwight Diehl, Michael Klinefelter, Tony Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Boney et al
as 4:2009cv00075
Plaintiff:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company and American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Delores Boney, Elizabeth Boney, Cynthia Boney and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Local Exchange Co, LLC et al v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. of America et al
as 4:2007cv00904
Plaintiff:
Local Exchange Co, LLC, Local Exchange Co, LLC, Cass County Telephone Company, L.P. and others
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. of America and Great American Insurance Co. of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Fuller v. Diehl et al
as 4:2007cv00759
Plaintiff:
Joe F. Fuller, Sr.
Defendant:
Dwight Diehl, Manford, Cass County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Voris v. Cass County Board of Commissioners
as 4:2007cv00635
Plaintiff:
Kendall C. Voris
Defendant:
Cass County Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller et al v. Cass County Board of Commissioners et al
as 4:2007cv00551
Plaintiff:
Joe F. Fuller, Sr. and John P. Calarosa, Jr.
Defendant:
Cass County Board of Commissioners, Dwight Diehl, Cass County Building Code and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
