Cases 21 - 30 of 3,004
Jeffrey Joseph v. Kurt Schmiedeskamp
as 24-1672
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Joseph
Defendant:
Craig Wheeler, Assistant Director Missouri Vocational Enterprises Metal Plant, Dennis Shepard, Director Missouri Vocational Enterprises Metal Plant and Kurt Schmiedeskamp, Supervisor of pressbraka line
Dennis Busby v. Doris Falkenrath, et al
as 24-1653
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Busby
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Warden, JCCC, Andrea Galbreath, Sergeant, JCCC, MO DOC and Ike, Corrections Officer, MO DOC
Drennan v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Dennis Drennan
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Henry Williams v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-1455
Plaintiff:
Henry Williams
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, ADC, Gary Musselwhite, Warden, Cummins Unit, Robert L. Pierce, Security Deputy Warden, Cummins Unit and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dennis Ball-Bey v. Kyle Chandler, et al
as 24-1417
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ball-Bey
Defendant:
Kyle Chandler, Police Officer, in his individual capacity, Ronald E. Vaughn, Police Officer, in his individual capacity, Samuel Dotson, III, Former Police Chief and others
Human v. Dennis Dillon Automotive Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Daniel Human
Defendant:
Dennis Dillon Automotive Group, Inc. doing business as Dennis Dillon Nissan and John and Jane Does 1 through 14
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Fairchild v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Dennis Fairchild
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
United States v. Dennis Hager
as 24-1384
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dennis Wayne Hager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
