Cases 21 - 30 of 228
Kai v. Holder et al
as 0:2014cv04707
Petitioner:
Liu Kai
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Jr. , Jeh Johnson , Scott R. Baniecke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Correll v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2014cv04168
Plaintiff:
Travis Emory Correll
Defendant:
The United States of America, Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. Holder et al
as 6:2014cv03485
Plaintiff:
Coy Phelps
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Charles Samuels, Linda Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Curtis Neeley, Jr. v. 5 Federal Communications, etc., et al
as 14-3447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Curtis James Neeley, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
5 Federal Communications Commissioners, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, et al., U.S. Representative Steve Womack and others
Correll v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2014cv04158
Petitioner:
Travis Emory Correll
Respondent:
The United States of America , Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jirak v. Terris et al
as 4:2014cv04128
Plaintiff:
Gene Jirak
Defendant:
J.A. Terris, True, Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv02998
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Schlegel v. Eric Holder, et al
as 14-2446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Schlegel
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric Holder, John Marti and United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Lindsey v. Holder et al
as 4:2014cv00517
Plaintiff:
Charles Lindsey
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Barrack Obama, Sly James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Holder
as 4:2014cv00487
Plaintiff:
Charles Lindsey
Defendant:
Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
