Cases 21 - 30 of 55
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Mendoza et al
as 4:2015cv00946
Plaintiff:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
Ernesto Mendoza and Justus Boat Transport Southern, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00423
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bargainer v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 4:2014cv00943
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bargainer
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Lerner v. Starling et al
as 4:2014cv00509
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lerner
Defendant:
David L. Starling, Michael W. Upchurch, Patrick J. Ottensmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Webster v. Kansas City Southern et al
as 4:2014cv00349
Plaintiff:
Gary Webster
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern , David L. Starling , David R. Ebbrecht and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gross v. Kansas City Southern et al
as 4:2014cv00345
Plaintiff:
Don L. Gross
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern , David L. Starling , David R. Ebbrecht and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kanza Construction, Inc. v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 4:2013cv00489
Plaintiff:
Kanza Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 4:2013cv00263
Defendant:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
O'Dell J. Jackson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
