Cases 21 - 30 of 55
McCollom v. Garbarini et al
as 2:2021cv00021
Defendant:
Rosemary Stiles, J Yates, R Poyner and others
Plaintiff:
Bradly McCollom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troy Williams v. Doe, et al
as 20-2041
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T Phone Company Tycoon, Jay Nixon, Former Missouri Governor, Donald W. Hinton, Doctor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Troy Williams
Fuller v. Stone County Court et al
as 3:2020cv05030
Plaintiff:
James Allen Fuller
Defendant:
Marsha Stiles and Stone County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallette et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00294
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Brian Stiles and Daimler AG
Plaintiff:
Pam Bottorff Mallette and Brandon Kyle Mallette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stiles et al v. WalMart, Inc. et al
as 5:2020mc00020
Defendant:
American International Industries, Inc. and WalMart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sharidan Stiles and Stiles 4 U, Inc.
Theodore Stiles, Jr. v. Brandon Hay, et al
as 19-2847
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Theodore R. Stiles, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Clarence Little, Contractor, Amber Congor Scott, Contractor and Brandon Hay, Baxter Springs Police Officer
Moler v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2019cv00097
Defendant:
Rosemary Stiles, Wooten, Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stiles v. Hay et al
as 3:2019cv05057
Plaintiff:
Theodore R Stiles, Jr
Defendant:
Brandon Hay, Amber Congor Scott and Clarence Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noyola v. Stiles et al
as 2:2019cv00092
Plaintiff:
Emilio Noyola
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Stiles, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines et al v. Bayer Corp. et al
as 4:2017cv01988
Plaintiff:
Keita Hines , Jody Evans , Jennifer Byron and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corp. , Bayer Healthcare LLC , Bayer Essure, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
