Cases 31 - 40 of 220
Florinda Niz-Chavez v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 22-2300
Petitioner:
Florinda Niz-Chavez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States and Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2233
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chavez Lopez v. Myers
as 8:2022cv00114
Petitioner:
Din G. Chavez Lopez
Respondent:
Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taqueria El Primo LLC, et al v. Farmers Group, Inc., et al
as 22-8002
Respondent:
Taqueria El Primo LLC, Victor Manuel Delgado Jimenez, Mitchelle Chavez Solis and others
Petitioner:
Farmers Group, Inc., Truck Insurance Exchange, Farmers Insurance Company, Inc. and others
Chavez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Anthony Chavez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chavez v. Lowe et al
as 4:2021cv03319
Plaintiff:
Rene Phillip Chavez
Defendant:
Jeremiah Joseph Lowe, III and Kearney Police Department, Kearney, Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02361
Plaintiff:
Julian Chavez, Jermain Stranlund and Robert Martinez
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Shavelle Chavez-Nelson v. Gov. Mark Dayton, et al
as 21-3173
Petitioner / Appellant:
Shavelle Oscar Chavez-Nelson
Respondent / Appellee:
Governor Mark Dayton and Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections
Leodan Alarcon-Chavez v. State of Nebraska, et al
as 21-3162
Petitioner:
Leodan Alarcon-Chavez
Respondent:
The State of Nebraska and Scott Frakes, Director of the Nebraska Department of Corrections
Rodriguez-Chavez v. Devereaux
as 5:2021cv04037
Plaintiff:
Miguel Rodriguez-Chavez
Defendant:
Bruce Devereaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
