Cases 31 - 40 of 641
United States v. Jonathan Bravo-Lopez
as 23-2728
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonathan M. Bravo-Lopez, also known as Shadow, also known as Jonathan Vravo
Lopez v. Ropper et al
as 4:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lopez
Defendant:
Ropper and Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Comes Investments, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Michele Lopez
Defendant:
Comes Investments, Inc., Joseph Comes, Jill Comes and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lopez et al v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
David Lopez and Jerome Cascio
Respondent:
T-Mobile USA Inc and T-Mobile US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dominga Lopez-Rafael v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2475
Petitioner:
Dominga Lopez-Rafael
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland
Shoemaker et al v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Shoemaker, Andrea L. Arroyo, Benjamin Atwell and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
In re: T-Mobile 2022 Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 4:2023md03073
Plaintiff:
Judith Lynch, Frankie J. Gonzalez, Lisa Frierson and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vitalina Lopez-Bautista v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2296
Petitioner:
Vitalina Angelicia Lopez-Bautista
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Klapp et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Adam Klapp, Charles Kinnard, Darrius Pearson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
