Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Chase Bank USA v. Aracena
as 4:2011mc03058
Defendant:
Brittani Leigh Aracena
Plaintiff:
Chase Bank USA
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Larrew v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.
as 4:2011cv00629
Plaintiff:
Twyla D. Larrew
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Company et al
as 4:2011cv00102
Plaintiff:
Harold G Smith , Trudy Smith and Warren Prince
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Company and Chase Bank USA NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
David v. JP Morgan Chase & Company et al
as 4:2010cv01415
Plaintiff:
John David
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Company and Chase Bank USA NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chase Bank USA, N.A. et al v. Matson
as 0:2010cv03951
Plaintiff:
Chase Bank USA, N.A. , JPMorgan Chase & Co. , Smith Larsen & Wixom and others
Defendant:
Theresa-Lynn Matson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. Wilde
as 4:2010mc03019
Plaintiff:
Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Defendant:
Theresa L. Wilde
Robert Townsend v. National Arbitration Forum, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv02263
Plaintiff:
Robert Townsend
Defendant:
National Arbitration Forum, Inc. , National Arbitration Forum, LLC , Agora Fund 1GP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. Tilford et al
as 8:2010mc00044
Plaintiff:
Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Defendant:
Marcy L. Tilford
Debtor:
Mark Aaron Tilford
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Sarah Irene Hancock v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
as 10-6012
Debtor:
In re: John William Hancock and Sarah Irene Hancock
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Sarah Irene Hancock
Defendant - Appellant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Originally Sued As Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc., Mark A. Bertsch, Donna M. Sommars and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
