Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Wesley v. Hancock
as 6:2022cv03279
Petitioner: Shaman Wesley
Defendant: Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Hancock
as 4:2022cv00523
Petitioner: Bryan M Pierce
Respondent: Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bruce et al v. City of Kennett, et al
as 1:2022cv00072
Plaintiff: Katherine F. Bruce, Jim R. Bruce, City of Kennett and others
Defendant: Nick Weatherwax, Roger Wheeler, Kay Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hancock v. DST Systems Inc
as 4:2021cv09121
Plaintiff: William Hancock
Defendant: DST Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Ratliff v. City of Kennett et al
as 1:2021cv00091
Defendant: Nick weatherwax, Kent Freeman, Kay Collins and others
Plaintiff: Jack D. Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hancock et al v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv00291
Defendant: Progressive Casualty Ins. Co. and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Hancock Concrete Pumping, LLC and Velmer Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Moton et al v. Comenity Bank
as 4:2020cv01182
Defendant: Comenity Bank
Plaintiff: Ashley Hancock and Mary Moton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Kingston Da-G.O.D. v. Precythe et al
as 1:2020cv00167
Defendant: Brittany Kitchen, Lorrene Armstrong, Tonya Young and others
Plaintiff: Universal-Unison A. Kingston Da-G.O.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coe v. Dysinger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00069
Plaintiff: Jr. Sidney P. Coe and Sidney P. Coe
Defendant: Unknown Nenseworthy, Unknown Hyten, Unknown Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock v. Williams et al
as 4:2019cv02755
Plaintiff: Joel Hancock
Defendant: SRT Oil Field Service, LLC and Grant Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?