Cases 31 - 40 of 5,877
Ware v. Corrections of Medicine
as 4:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Andre T. Ware
Defendant:
Corrections of Medicine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Sephten McCane
as 24-1712
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sephten T. McCane
Malloy v. Trileaf Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Deborah Malloy
Defendant:
Trileaf Corporation and T. Scott Muschany
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Doss et al v. AT&T Inc.
as 4:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Doss, Bethany Miller and Aimee Jarvis
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ms. Jaami Ali v. AT & T, et al
as 24-1682
Plaintiff:
Ms. Jaami Ali
Defendant:
AT & T, T-Mobile USA, Inc., T-Mobile for Sprint and others
Jessica Vanicek v. Kenneth Kratt, et al
as 24-1673
Plaintiff:
Jessica Vanicek, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ryan T. Vanicek, Thomas Vanicek, Individually, and Parents of the Deceased, Ryan T. Vanicek, Karen Vanicek, Individually, and Parents of the Deceased, Ryan T. Vanicek and others
Intervenor:
Lyman-Richey Corporation, doing business as Central Sand and Gravel Company
Defendant:
Kenneth E. Kratt and Sandair Corporation
Millner v. AT&T Services, Inc.
as 0:2024cv01082
Plaintiff:
Noah Millner
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Ware v. St. Louis City Justice Center
as 4:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Andre T. Ware
Defendant:
St. Louis City Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware v. Keefe Commissary
as 4:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Andre T. Ware
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humes v. T-Mobile Security John Doe
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
T-Mobile Security John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
