Cases 41 - 50 of 961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Ford v. Board of Healing Arts
as 4:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Jamie Sue Ford
Defendant:
Board of Healing Arts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
McGarvey v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2023cv00748
Plaintiff:
Brenda McGarvey
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Ford v. State of Arkansas et al
as 5:2023cv05174
Plaintiff:
Marcus Da'Ron Ford
Defendant:
State of Arkansas and Governor Sarah Huckabee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Glutality Provider Group, P.A.
as 3:2023cv05082
Plaintiff:
Jaime Ford
Defendant:
Glutality Provider Group, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Riesmeyer, et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2023cv01182
Plaintiff:
Andrew Riesmeyer and Lesley Riesemeyer
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Ulses v. Chemguard, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01165
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC, Inc., Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Ulses
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ford v. Farha Roofing, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Brianna Ford
Defendant:
Farha Roofing, LLC and Farha Roofing KC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02818
Plaintiff:
Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
