Cases 41 - 50 of 4,042
Carmichael v. Williams
as 6:2024cv03013
Petitioner:
Kenja Carmichael
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams et al v. Mr. Bult's Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Patricia Williams, Ivy Johnson and Tanya Mayes
Defendant:
Mr. Bult's Inc. doing business as Mr. Bult's MBI and Joshua L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ward v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ward
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Latonya Young, Lorene Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Augustine et al
as 4:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Arnold
Defendant:
Kenneth P. Augustine, Christopher Neace, Luke James Stobie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cozine v. Dolgencorp, LLC
as 4:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
William C. Cozine
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Umpa v. National Association of Realtors et al
as 4:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Daniel Umpa
Defendant:
National Association of Realtors, HomeServices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Tapley v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Derek Tapley
Defendant:
William Jones, Robert Embly and City of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tapley v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Derek Tapley
Defendant:
William Jones, Robert Embly and City of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cain v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00113
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
William Levi Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Williams v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Debby Williams
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
