Cases 51 - 57 of 57
Thompson et al v. Anoka-Hennepin EM Narcotics & Violent Crimes Task Force et al
as 0:2008cv04939
Plaintiff:
Nicole Thompson and Bradford Thompson
Defendant:
Anoka-Hennepin EM Narcotics & Violent Crimes Task Force, Anoka-Hennepin EM Narcotics & Violent Crimes Task Force, John Doe Sergeant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller et al v. Air EVAC Leasing Corporation et al
as 5:2008cv05049
Plaintiff:
Dee Ann Miller, Dee Ann Miller, Mike Miller and others
Defendant:
Air EVAC Leasing Corporation, Air EVAC EMS, Inc. and Dennis C. Enders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hoekstra et al v. Arnold, Missouri, City of et al
as 4:2008cv00267
Plaintiff:
James W. Hoekstra and Kara L. Hoekstra
Defendant:
Arnold, Missouri, City of, American Traffic Solutions, Mark Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. Precision Airmotive LLC et al
as 4:2007cv01695
Defendant:
Avco Corporation, Avco Corporation, Avco Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kari Johnson, Kari Johnson, Kari Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash
Sustainable Community Development, L.L.C. et al v. EMRO USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00640
Plaintiff:
Sustainable Community Development, L.L.C., Sustainable Community Development, L.L.C., Biosyntrophy Solutions, LLC and others
Defendant:
EMRO USA, Inc., EM Hawaii LLC, CEMP USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Arneson v. Air EVAC EMS, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv04009
Plaintiff:
Robert I. Arneson, Jr., Robert I. Arneson, Jr. and Robert I. Arneson, Jr.
Defendant:
Air EVAC EMS, Inc., Air EVAC EMS, Inc., Air EVAC Leasing Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
