Cases 61 - 70 of 408
Johnson et al v. Douglas County, Nebraska
as 8:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Gayle M. Johnson and Brian Johnson
Defendant:
Douglas County, Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gee v. Douglas Cty, Prosecutor
as 8:2022cv00035
Petitioner:
Brian D. Gee
Respondent:
Douglas Cty, Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McClure v. Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Douglas McClure
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Freeman v. Douglas Cty Prosecutor
as 8:2022cv00021
Petitioner:
Micah Freeman
Respondent:
Douglas Cty Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nielsen v. Douglas Cty Prosecutor
as 8:2022cv00024
Petitioner:
Dustin L. Nielsen
Respondent:
Douglas Cty Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Summers v. Omaha Police Department et al
as 8:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
Heather Summers
Defendant:
Omaha Police Department, Douglas County Sheriff Department, Sarpy County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 8:2021cv00415
Plaintiff:
Kelly White
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and Douglas County, Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price v. Douglas County Corrections
as 8:2021cv00389
Plaintiff:
Michael James Price
Defendant:
Douglas County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Douglas County Corrections
as 8:2021cv00355
Plaintiff:
Michael James Price
Defendant:
Douglas County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatus v. Peterson et al
as 8:2021cv00380
Plaintiff:
DeRon D. Gatus
Defendant:
Shane Peterson, II, Steven Rose, Steven Gillot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
