Cases 61 - 70 of 671
Williams v. Arkansas Department of Corrections
as 3:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
LaTonya Williams
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Albert Simmons
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Dexter Pain and Joe Page
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hogg et al
as 4:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Williams
Defendant:
Hogg, Phillip Green and Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholson v. Earl et al
as 1:2022cv01011
Plaintiff:
Gary Nicholson
Defendant:
D Earl, Wellpath Medical Services, K Marter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Brodie Levi Stone
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Ashley Monk and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholson v. Earl et al
as 4:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Gary Nicholson
Defendant:
D Earl, Wellpath Medical Services, K Marter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lee v. Moody et al
as 2:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Terri N Moody, Gary R Kerstein, Tracy Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelsey v. Cobb et al
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Tony Kelsey
Defendant:
Mary Cobb, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
London v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 4:2021cv01225
Plaintiff:
Ricky D London
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, WellPath, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
