Cases 61 - 70 of 75
White v. Sarpy County, Nebraska et al
as 8:2009cv00327
Plaintiff:
Emily White
Defendant:
Sarpy County, Nebraska, Sarpy County Jail, In its capacity as a custodial institute and as an entity under the direct authority of Sarpy County, Nebraska, Unknown Correctional Officers, in their capacities as Supervising Correctional Officers or otherwise for Sarpy County, Nebraska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Smith et al
as 4:2009cv03145
Plaintiff:
Joseph E White, Joseph E White and Joseph E White
Defendant:
Richard T. Smith, Burdette Lee Searcey, Gerald Lamkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Petters et al
as 8:2008mc00074
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Deanna Coleman, Robert White and others
Receiver:
Douglas A. Kelley
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hess et al v. Bank First et al
as 8:2008cv00406
Plaintiff:
Mark H. Hess and Pam K. Hess
Defendant:
Bank First, Clark Froehlich, RJ Gall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White v. Total Recovery, LLC
as 8:2008cv00374
Plaintiff:
Sharlett White
Defendant:
Total Recovery, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White Cap Construction Supply v Tighten Fastener and Supply, et al
as 8:2008cv00264
Plaintiff:
White Cap Construction Supply and White Cap Construction Supply
Defendant:
Tighten Fastener and Supply, Matt Updike, Mike Neneman and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kier v. Carlson et al
as 8:2008cv00254
Plaintiff:
Nyaluak Kier
Defendant:
April Carlson and Any White Caucasian
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White v. Bracken et al
as 8:2008cv00085
Plaintiff:
Najah H. White
Defendant:
Bracken, Pam Bracken and Jeffrey White
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
