Cases 71 - 80 of 121
Barcomb v. General Motors LLC
as 4:2016cv01884
Plaintiff:
Richard Barcomb
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schmidt et al v. General Motors LLC
as 8:2016cv00474
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Schmidt and Lewis R. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dunlap et.al v. General Motors LLC
as 4:2016cv01060
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Plaintiff:
Terri Dunlap , Heather Worsham , Glory Celestine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
General Motors LLC, Plan Administrator for the General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan v. Qualls et al
as 4:2016cv01197
Plaintiff:
General Motors LLC, Plan Administrator for the General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan
Defendant:
Rubye J. Qualls and Asterlean Qualls
Cross_claimant:
Rubye J. Qualls
Cross_defendant:
Asterlean Qualls
Counter_claimant:
Asterlean Qualls
Counter_defendant:
General Motors LLC, Plan Administrator for the General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Michael Bavlsik, et al v. General Motor
as 16-1632
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Michael Bavlsik and Kathleen Skelly
Defendant - Appellant:
General Motors, LLC
Craine v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2016cv00069
Plaintiff:
Donna J Craine
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Michael Bavlsik, et al v. General Motor
as 16-1491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Bavlsik and Kathleen Skelly
Defendant - Appellee:
General Motors, LLC
Bergman v. General Motors, LLC
as 4:2015cv01607
Plaintiff:
Frank Bergman
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farrar v. General Motors LLC
as 4:2015cv00708
Plaintiff:
Dwight Farrar
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Moss v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2015cv00200
Plaintiff:
Andrew Moss
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
