Cases 71 - 80 of 346
Rose v. Shriver et al
as 4:2019cv00206
Defendant:
Jeffery Hams, Christina Shriver, Tony Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcel William Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. H&R Block Inc et al
as 4:2019cv00470
Defendant:
H&R Block Tax Services LLC and H&R Block Inc
Plaintiff:
Colleen Griffith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Griffith v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv05039
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Cari Griffith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McPherson v. Ramey et al
as 2:2019cv04101
Defendant:
Eland Unknown, J. Cofield, Unknown Dittman and others
Plaintiff:
Chang Bruno McPherson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Lawson et al
as 2:2019cv04092
Defendant:
Loretta Moss, State of Missouri, Missouri Board of Probation and Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin Dudley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. St. Louis Police Dept. et al
as 4:2019cv01178
Defendant:
Brad Roy, Brent Fincher, Michael Dewayne Griffith and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton Franklin v. Franklin County, Arkansas, et al
as 19-1854
Defendant:
Nicholas James, individually and in his capacity as a Franklin County Sheriff's Deputy, Anthony Boen, in his official capacity as Franklin County Sheriff, James Molton and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Nathan Griffith and Joseph Griffith
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Clayton Franklin, as Administrator for the Estate of Cody J. Franklin
Jerry Rutlin v. Cindy Griffith
as 19-1847
Respondent / Appellee:
Cindy Griffith, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jerry Rutlin
Bazoon et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv01007
Plaintiff:
Darrel Griffith, Jesse Hibbs, Aaron Oakes and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Joshua Wolf v. Cindy Griffith
as 19-1748
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joshua Wolf
Respondent / Appellee:
Jay Cassady, Warden and Cindy Griffith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
