Cases 81 - 90 of 114
Holmes v. State of Missouri
as 4:2013cv02258
Petitioner:
Glenn M. Holmes, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holmes et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01785
Plaintiff:
Martha Jean Holmes and Kathleen Ann Illig
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anna Acquaviva et al v. Organon USA Inc et al
as 4:2013cv01323
Plaintiff:
Anna Acquaviva , Cynthia Sue Austin , Jennifer Lynn Brindley and others
Defendant:
Organon USA Inc , Organon Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., LLC , Organon International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
State of Missouri v. Holmes
as 4:2013cv00198
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri
Defendant:
Clarence A. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
State of Missouri v. Holmes
as 4:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri
Defendant:
Clarence A. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Brinkley et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
as 4:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
Angie Brinkley , Alexander Williams , Kenneth Boehmer and others
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holmes v. Slay et al
as 4:2012cv02333
Plaintiff:
Michael Holmes
Defendant:
Francis G. Slay , Bettye Battle-Turner , Richard Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Holmes v. Astrue
as 6:2012cv03468
Plaintiff:
Joni Holmes
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
