Cases 1 - 10 of 537
Abdikarim v. Fitzgibbons et al
as 0:2024cv02187
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Sheriff Barry Fitzgibbons, Tim Brennan, Conor R West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Fitzgibbons et al
as 0:2024cv02012
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Barry Fitzgibbons, Tim Brennan and Michelle Marie Eldien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miracle v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01820
Plaintiff:
Tim Miracle
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
American Alliance for Equal Rights v. Walz
as 0:2024cv01748
Plaintiff:
American Alliance for Equal Rights
Defendant:
Tim Walz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC v. Beattie et al
as 0:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC doing business as Running Aces
Defendant:
Michael Beattie, Craig Beaulieu, Raymond Brenny and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Berry et al v. Walz et al
as 0:2024cv00962
Petitioner:
Cederic Lamont Berry and Cedric Lamont Berry
Respondent:
Tim Walz and Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bott et al v. Gravier et al
as 0:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Tim Bott and Joy Bott
Defendant:
Robert Gravier, Candy Gravier and Allan Block Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nistler v. Walz et al
as 0:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Lance Nistler
Defendant:
Tim Walz and Thom Petersen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Toro Company, The v. Sutterlin et al
as 0:2023cv03873
Plaintiff:
Toro Company, The
Defendant:
Steve Sutterlin, Tim Angel and Yakta Inc. doing business as Yakta Mowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Day v. Ellison et al
as 0:2023cv03826
Plaintiff:
Roger Jerome Day
Defendant:
Keith Ellison, Tim Walz and Dan Ganin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
