Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 1 - 10 of 165
Dunham v. Advance Correctional Health et al
as 4:2024cv00377
Defendant: Christy Dow, David Strickland, Robert Busetti and others
Plaintiff: David E Dunham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manar v. Loancare, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv06026
Plaintiff: April Manar
Defendant: Loancare, LLC and Fidelity National Financial Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Manar v. Loancare, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv06024
Plaintiff: April Manar
Defendant: Loancare, LLC and Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Goertz v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03261
Plaintiff: April D. Goertz
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Goertz v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03262
Plaintiff: April D. Goertz
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Benzuly v. Marcus Theatres Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00953
Plaintiff: April Benzuly
Defendant: Marcus Theatres Corporation doing business as Marcus Ronnie's Cinema
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Wilson v. Morriss et al
as 2:2023cv04122
Plaintiff: Keith Wilson
Defendant: Kelly Morriss, April Vanover, Cheryl Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Human v. Window Nation St. Louis, MO. et al
as 4:2023cv00489
Plaintiff: Daniel Human
Defendant: Window Nation, Window Nation, LLC, Aaron Magden and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Waterman v. Bergankdv, Ltd.
as 4:2022cv00692
Plaintiff: April Waterman
Defendant: Bergankdv, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Ventrone et al v. Webster University
as 4:2022cv00513
Plaintiff: Jeanette Ventrone, Angela Williams, Phoenix Pereira and others
Defendant: Webster University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?