Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Barnett v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2026cv01234
Plaintiff:
Dewey Austin Barnett, II
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Mike Kehoe and Stephanie Kopelinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Payne et al
as 4:2026cv00783
Plaintiff:
Christian Jackson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Justine Minor, Rolanda Scruggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnette-Kruger v. Cole County Jail et al
as 2:2026cv04183
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lawrence Barnette-Kruger
Defendant:
Cole County Jail, Christropher Kirby Limbaugh, Brian K. Stumpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Intenseye Inc v. Barnett et al
as 4:2026cv00773
Plaintiff:
Intenseye Inc
Defendant:
Robert Barnett and Dragonfruit AI Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Barnett v. USA
as 4:2026cv01104
Petitioner:
Johnathan Barnett
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Barnett v. Hancock et al
as 1:2026cv00169
Plaintiff:
Dewey A. Barnett
Defendant:
Gregory Hancock and Unknown Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Hancock et al
as 1:2026cv00163
Plaintiff:
Dewey A Barnett
Defendant:
Gregory Hancock and Unknown Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNETT v. COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION et al
as 4:2026cv00991
Plaintiff:
Marion Barnett
Defendant:
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation and TriZetto Provider Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barnett v. Unknown et al
as 1:2026cv00145
Plaintiff:
Dewey Austin Barnett
Defendant:
Alex Unknown and Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Stacey
as 4:2026cv00948
Plaintiff:
Dewey A. Barnett
Defendant:
Presiding Judge Brenda Stacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
