Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Johnson v. Erickson et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2020cv04168
Defendant:
Dave Erickson, Damian Weets, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Johnson and Charles Ray Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles Johnson v. Damian Weets
as 19-2161
Defendant / Appellee:
Damian Weets, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles R. Johnson
Charles Johnson v. Brookings Police Department
as 19-2388
Defendant / Appellee:
Brookings Police Department
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles R. Johnson
Charles Johnson v. John McQuistion
as 19-2377
Defendant / Appellee:
John McQuistion, Parole Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles R. Johnson
Charles Johnson v. John McQuisition
as 19-2380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles R. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
John McQuistion, South Dakota Dept. of Parole
Charles Johnson v. Ashley Johnson
as 19-2390
Defendant / Appellee:
Ashley Johnson, Costello Property Management
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles R. Johnson
Charles Johnson v. Springfield Prison
as 19-2378
Defendant / Appellee:
Springfield Prison, (Mike Durfee State Prison)
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles R. Johnson
Johnson v. Fluke et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2019cv04123
Defendant:
Unknown Hygienist, Warden Fluke and Unknown Dentist
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Johnson v. Jameson Annex
as 19-1731
Defendant / Appellee:
Jameson Annex
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles R. Johnson
Johnson v. Experian
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2019cv04036
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Johnson
Defendant:
Experian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.