Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Clark v. Cabrera et al
as 4:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
Linda D Clark
Defendant:
Julio Cesar Cabrera and Calderon & Cabrera Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hill v. Wood et al
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill
Defendant:
Raymond C. Wood, Jerry L. Amonds, Jeffrey D. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Redington
as 4:2021cv00452
Respondent:
Daniel Redington
Petitioner:
Nathan D Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States v. Edward Clark
as 21-2090
Defendant / Appellant:
Edward D. Clark
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Antonieo Clark v. Paul Blair, et al
as 21-1400
Respondent / Appellee:
Paul Blair and Eric Stephen Schmitt, Missouri Attorney General
Petitioner / Appellant:
Antonieo D. Clark
Washington v. Wudel et al
as 4:2019cv01041
Plaintiff:
Thomas Washington
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Service, Dr. Robert Wudel, Jeffrey D. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Ramey
as 4:2019cv00907
Petitioner:
Antonieo D. Clark
Respondent:
Eileen Ramey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. Ligon et al
as 8:2018cv00218
Defendant:
Scottie D. Clark and John Brad Ligon
Plaintiff:
Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Derrick Smith v. George Lombardi, et al
as 16-3935
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derrick Ray Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
George Lombardi, Missouri Department of Corrections Director, Individual Capacity, Dave Dormire, Missouri Department of Corrections Director, Individual Capacity, J. Cofield, MODOC Director of Operations, Individual Capacity and others
Smith et al v. Lombardi et al
as 1:2016cv00112
Plaintiff:
Derrick R. Smith
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Dave Dormire, J. Cofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
