Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Davis v. Gross et al
as 8:2023cv00548
Plaintiff:
LaToyin V. Davis
Defendant:
Spencer D. Gross, AON Risk and Domino's Pizza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Domino's Pizza, LLC et al v. Agri Stats, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv01831
Plaintiff:
Domino's Pizza, LLC and Domino's Pizza Distribution, LLC
Defendant:
Agri Stats, Inc., Clemens Food Group, LLC, The Clemens Family Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Matt Luiken, et al v. Domino's Pizza, LLC
as 12-1216
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Matt Luiken and Jon Sandquist, on behalf of themselves, all others similarly situated, and the Proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class
Defendant - Appellant:
Domino's Pizza, LLC
Matt Luiken, et al v. Domino's Pizza, LLC
as 11-8029
Plaintiff - Respondent:
Matt Luiken and Jon Sandquist, on behalf of themselves, all others similarly situated, and the Proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class
Defendant - Petitioner:
Domino's Pizza, LLC
Nelson v. Domino's Pizza, LLC
as 0:2011cv00111
Plaintiff:
Roger Nelson
Defendant:
Domino's Pizza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv06042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Luiken et al v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv00516
Plaintiff:
Matt Luiken, Matt Luiken, Jon Sandquist and others
Defendant:
Domino's Pizza, LLC, Domino's Pizza, LLC and Domino's Pizza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Le v. Domino's Pizza, LLC
as 0:2008cv04787
Plaintiff:
David Le, David Le and David Le
Defendant:
Domino's Pizza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kevin Bores, et al v. Domino's Pizza, LLC
as 07-2520
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Kevin Bores, Jennifer Huber, Christopher McCormick and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Domino's Pizza, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
