Cases 1 - 10 of 42
United States of America v. $4,698,514.00 in United States Currency et al
as 8:2024cv00160
Defendant:
$4,698,514.00 in United States Currency, $2,033,094.98 in United States Currency, $630,680.00 in United States Currency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Galvan v. Concrete Strategies
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Mason Galvan
Defendant:
Concrete Strategies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Contreras v. MC 1 Transport, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01607
Plaintiff:
Jesus Contreras
Defendant:
MC 1 Transport, LLC, Jose Galvan-Garcia, Fox Trucking Xpress, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Contreras v. MC 1 Transport, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Jesus Contreras
Defendant:
MC 1 Transport, LLC, Jose H. Galvan-Garcia, Fox Trucking Xpress, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Kinard et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
Brian Kinard, Laywood Molette, Jonathan Overfelt and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Lourdes Galvez-Galvan v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. ***Do not file in this case - All filings should be made in 4:21-md-3019.***
as 4:2021cv00872
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Galvez-Galvan
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Carbajal-Galvan v. Arnott
as 6:2021cv03257
Petitioner:
Anibal Carbajal-Galvan
Respondent:
James Arnott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States v. Julie Andrade
as 21-1382
Defendant / Appellant:
Julie Diane Andrade, also known as Julie Galvan
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
