Cases 1 - 10 of 18,610
Continental Baker LLC v. J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. d/b/a JM Eagle
as 0:2024cv02164
Plaintiff:
Continental Baker LLC
Defendant:
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. d/b/a JM Eagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Garcia v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv02160
Plaintiff:
Michael Garcia
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
United States v. Daniel Binion
as 24-2146
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Binion, also known as Daniel Lucas, also known as Donald Lucas, also known as Donald Jackson, also known as Daniel J. Lucas, also known as Kenneth Jackson, also known as Terrell Lucas, also known as Frank
Ford v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Ford
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, Renata J. Olafson Selzer, Brianna Kraft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stanley v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Stanley
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wright-Geis v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv02063
Plaintiff:
Addie Estella Wright-Geis
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ertz v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Karla LeAnn Ertz
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rondeau v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv02049
Plaintiff:
James Rondeau
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Shelton v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Dennis Dean Shelton
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
