Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lynch et al v. Tames et al
as 5:2023cv05015
Plaintiff:
James Lynch and Shannon Lynch
Cross Claimant:
James Jim Tames doing business as Black Diamond Body Armor
Defendant:
Black Diamond JA LC, D&F Equipment Sales Incorporated, Arkansas Machine Works Incorporated and others
Cross Defendant:
Leeco Steel LLC and Nucor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States v. Jeremiah Lynch
as 22-2272
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jeremiah James Lynch
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. City of Raytown, Mo. et al
as 4:2015cv00447
Plaintiff:
Dederick Kelly
Defendant:
City of Raytown, Mo. , Nathan T Brand , Jared P Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynch et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv01972
Plaintiff:
Margaret Lynch and James Lynch
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Mitchell et al
as 0:2012cv01751
Plaintiff:
Shepard Johnson
Defendant:
Chester Mitchell, Catherine Mitchell, Julie Anne Kahler and others
Trustee:
J. Russell Cunningham
Intervenor_plaintiff:
J. Michael Hopper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Knappen v. Iowa Changers Incorporated et al
as 4:2007cv00152
Plaintiff:
Kurt Knappen and Kurt Knappen
Defendant:
Iowa Changers Incorporated, Iowa Changers Incorporated, Kathryn Arlene Place and others
Counter Claimant:
Iowa Changers Incorporated, Iowa Changers Incorporated, Kathryn Arlene Place and others
Counter Defendant:
Kurt Knappen and Kurt Knappen
Third Party Plaintiff:
Iowa Changers Incorporated, Iowa Changers Incorporated, Kathryn Arlene Place and others
Third Party Defendant:
James Lynch
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
