Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Marvin Hildreth, Jr. v. Chad Sheehan, et al
as 24-2629
Defendant:
Pickering, Correction Officer, Katelyn Speed, Correction Officer, Todd Harlow, Captain and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lynn Hildreth, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2771
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lucero v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01879
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lloyd W. Lucero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lucero v. Atomic Provisions LLC
as 4:2023cv00603
Plaintiff:
Lauren Lucero
Defendant:
Atomic Provisions LLC
Lucero v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv00987
Plaintiff:
Shelly Lucero
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Hildreth v. Sheehan et al
as 5:2023cv04010
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lynn Hildreth, Jr
Defendant:
Chad Sheehan, Woodbury County Jail, Todd Harlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wasia Maya v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 23-1305
Petitioner:
Wasia Kessi Maya
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Not Classified By Court:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director U.S. ICE, Henry Lucero, U.S. ICE Director Chicago Field Office and others
BNSF Railway Company v. Magin et al
as 2:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
Pauline Magin, Angelika Salazar, Tiffany Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak, BNSF Railway Company, MS Contracting, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
