Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Garrett et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Dwayne M Garrett and Paul Leroy Wickham
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Mike Johnson, Eastern District of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tyler v. Korneman
as 4:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Melvin Leroy Tyler
Respondent:
Sherie L. Korneman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christine v. Jenny Mehann et al
as 5:2023cv06158
Plaintiff:
Earl Christine
Defendant:
Jenny Mehann, Corizon Medical, Centurion Medical and others
Interested Party:
Melvin Leroy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Department of Correction et al
as 2:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Nathan Leroy Hicks
Defendant:
Department of Correction and C.O. on Duty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fullington v. Precythe et al
as 2:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Kevin Leroy Fullington, Sr.
Defendant:
Anne Precythe, Clay Stanton, Taylor Preston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Pettigrew
as 4:2023cv00384
Petitioner:
Nathan Leroy Hicks
Respondent:
Shawn Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Schrader v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv05070
Plaintiff:
True Leroy Schrader
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Coleman v. Buckner
as 4:2022cv00814
Petitioner:
Leroy Coleman, Jr.
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Precythe et al
as 2:2021cv04244
Plaintiff:
Joseph Leroy Thompson
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Michael Shewmaker, S Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
