Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Culver v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01018
Petitioner:
Norris Wade Culver, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clervrain et al v. Ferriero et al
as 4:2021cv00405
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Osei Fosu Fran Cobbina, Osei Fosu Francis Cobbina and others
Defendant:
David Ferriero, Ross Wilburn, June Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davison v. Grand Jury
as 4:2021cv00337
Plaintiff:
Norris Davison
Defendant:
Grand Jury, Southern District Of Iowa and John Harvey
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davison v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00310
Petitioner:
Norris Davison
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mossman et al v. United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al
as 1:2021cv00028
Plaintiff:
Asa Mossman, Richard McConkie, Millstone Properties, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Rochelle P. Walensky, Norris Cochran, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Helm v. Sons of Silence MC, The et al
as 2:2020cv01033
Defendant:
Scott Mcdermott, Courier, The, Kate Riley and others
Plaintiff:
True Vision Tattoos and Fine Arts LLC, Jacob Curtis Allen Helm and Green City Custom Tattoos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. NAPCO, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00237
Defendant:
NAPCO, Inc. and Norris Asphalt Paving Co., LC
Plaintiff:
Sean D. Harris
Smith v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00005
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Anthony Norris Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hughes v. USA
as 3:2017cv03004
Plaintiff:
Norris O'Dell Hughes, Jr
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. USA
as 4:2013cv00348
Petitioner:
Anthony Norris Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
