Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Shawn Canada v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-2091
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, In his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Minnesota Dept. of Corrections, et al., Andrew Karlsen, In their official capacity as the staff of Hearing & Release unit of Minnesota Dept. of Corrections Officers and others
Abram v. Lien et al
as 6:2024cv02017
Plaintiff:
Christopher W Abram
Defendant:
Lien Sergeant, Huckfeldt Officer, Officer Aneweer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Saari v. Jesse Pugh, Warden
as 23-3728
Petitioner:
Joseph Thomas Saari
Respondent:
Jesse Pugh, Warden of MCF--Rush City
Holmes v. Minnesota DOC et al
as 0:2023cv02969
Plaintiff:
Stephan Nicholas Holmes
Defendant:
Minnesota DOC, State of MN, Joan Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joel Munt v. Jesse Pugh
as 23-3087
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joel Marvin Munt
Respondent / Appellee:
Jesse Pugh
Canada v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, Andrew Karlsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mondor v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv02511
Plaintiff:
David Mondor
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Michelle Smith, Guy Bosch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Andersen v. Jesse Pugh
as 23-2615
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eugene Andersen
Respondent:
Jesse Pugh, Warden Rush City Correctional Facility
Nelson v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv02029
Plaintiff:
Chad Nicholas Nelson
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Jesse Pugh, Josh Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delaney v. Pugh
as 0:2023cv01942
Petitioner:
Clinton Delaney
Respondent:
Jesse Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
